A new bombshell report from the California Post has drawn federal scrutiny and reinforced the argument that the Los Angeles mayoral election results are bogus.
After a week of “counting” and sitting on and supplementing a mere few million ballots in California, Democrat Xavier Becerra finally edged ahead of Republican Steve Hilton in the gubernatorial race, while distant third socialist Nithya Raman went shooting ahead of registered Republican Spencer Pratt for the Los Angeles mayoral runoff. DDHQ did predict confidently that Hilton would still be advancing to the general election, but a sudden series of statistically improbable drops days after the election actually happened in the L.A. race supposedly shoved Pratt out of his second-place slot against Democrat Mayor Karen Bass. Now the Post can reveal that a homeless shelter that received a sizable grant thanks to Councilwoman Raman has dozens of voters registered there despite not offering them living accommodations.
Bill Essayli, first assistant U.S. attorney for the central district of California, who described the state as a “fraudsters’ paradise” and confirmed serious election irregularities there, has promised to investigate the evidence the Post uncovered. He will assess if homeless shelters and Raman were involved in illegal activities.
[The Post] A review of records shows 7,600 voters tied to homeless shelters and service providers.
Among them was St. Joseph Center in Venice, a homeless services drop-in center with 185 registered voters tied to its address. The organization received a $600,000 taxpayer-funded grant awarded by Raman while she chaired the City Council’s Housing and Homelessness Committee…The largest concentration of homeless voters was at the Midnight Mission in Skid Row, where voting records show 1,160 registrations — but its website shows it only has beds for 84 men and 36 women.
One homeless man on Skid Row, Norman, said he’s witnessed voter registration efforts in the area for years and claims he had previously been paid to help sign up voters — and that cigarettes were offered to some people during the drives.
This is the Post’s story, and you can read all about it in its article. I would also recommend looking up Brenda Lee Brown Armstrong, who is on trial for orchestrating just such illegal voter registration drives as described above. What I want to do in this article is urge Republicans, both voters and politicians, to be willing to challenge the election results in Los Angeles and pursue legal redress aggressively to overturn them if they are fraudulent.
Recommended: BREAKING: Jury Sentences Karmelo Anthony
We now have evidence that the 2020 presidential election was impacted by fraud, and quite possibly changed by it. There are more questionable votes in Georgia alone than Joe Biden's 2020 margin of victory in that state. But what will happen, even if the Trump administration establishes that the election was stolen, as it has hinted it could do? Will Republicans have the guts to impeach Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson and all the judges appointed by an illegitimate president? Will they reject all Biden's signed laws and fire all his bureaucratic appointments? What will justice look like?
The impacts of a stolen election are incalculable. And while the L.A. election does not have quite the impact of a presidential election, Los Angeles, as one of America's most influential and populous cities, does have power to affect not only California but the country. If Democrats stole the mayoral race, and they get away with it, there will never be a real election in California again.
Republicans have a serious issue of being terrified to challenge judicial decisions and election “results”. It has gotten to the point in America now where so long as a judge issues a ruling, no matter how egregiously it is in violation of the law, they accept it. Likewise, once election results are announced, they are terrified of genuinely denying those results are legitimate. It is time that the GOP asked itself whether we truly believe in law and order, which means following constitutional laws rather than activist judicial decisions, and aggressively punishing crimes, or whether we are too terrified of Democrats to save our elections from irreversible corruption.
