Chronicling the ongoing intersectional struggle to liberate women — progressively defined to include the legacy kind and the transgender variety — from the Patriarchy™, one microaggression at a time.
What right do men have that women don’t?
At a recent group panel hosted by pro-life activist Lila Rose discussing the various alleged predations of the Patriarchy™, Rose asked an OG Karen boomer spending her golden years doing her best Gloria Steinem (RIP) impression the seemingly very basic question: “What is a right today that men have that women don’t have?”
Related: Hillary Claims ‘Climate Change’ Killed 500,000 Last Year, ‘Particularly Pregnant Women’
This query elicited a shrill guffaw from Gloria Steinem’s (RIP) spirit animal, dripping with condescension, followed by a non-sequitur claim that “white men and white women are issued at birth in white developed countries… they are issued a privilege entitlement card.”
(Granny is entirely too old to be parroting the “white privilege card” talking point that you’d expect to hear from your local Zoomer antifa hog with green hair and a septum piercing when she should be enjoying her retirement, playing bridge and aggressively sharing photos of her grandchildren unprompted with anyone within eyesight.)
As the “privilege card” thing in no way answered the question asked, Rose repeats it.
“Abortion,” Karen granny answers.
Related: NPR Releases Hardcore Abortion Porn Audio to Savor on Your Morning Commute
Rose then corrected her; in California, where this clown show took place, abortion is fully legal up to nine months, soon very likely to be post-birth as well.
Without skipping a beat, OG Karen granny pivoted then to the “abortion pill” mifepristone and the GOP’s alleged crusade to get it banned.
Rose, once again, exhibiting the patience of a saint, rebutted the elderly Karen with the factual claim that mifepristone is still sold nationwide despite the GOP controlling all three branches of federal government.
None of the extremely rational responses to OG Karen granny's overwrought claims of oppression appeared to have taken hold.
Coconut Lady resurfaces to defend DEI, ‘maternal healthcare’
Blissfully, mercifully, she’s been relatively low-profile since her historic, brutal 2024 election defeat despite having literally every advantage — legacy media in the tank for her, massive cash advantage, baked-in voter fraud, etc. — imaginable.
But recently, none other than the Coconut Lady herself, Queen of the K-Hive, the cackling pantsuit heroine who never was, who bumped her diverse head on that glass ceiling, thwarted once again by the Patriarchy™, appeared alongside Michigan Senate candidate Abdul El-Sayed — ostensibly to help him win the election, although I don’t know what convinced him that she could ever be anything other than a massive liability.
Related: WATCH: MSNBC Suggests Trump Plans to Deport African-Americans
During their joint appearance, she offered a profound lecture on the fascist attack on DEI and its implications for “maternal care”:
The attack on DEI is an attack on maternal care. An attack on DEI… to recognize diversity, equity, and inclusion is an attack, by definition*, an attack on maternal care.
*I don’t think she understands what “by definition” means.
By “maternal healthcare,” of course, Kamala means, primarily, abortion.
