Archiving the “strange death of Europe,” as Douglas Murray put it, and the West more broadly, at the hands of the neoliberal technocracy.
Swiss migration authority: Over 80% of North African ‘asylum seekers’ in Switzerland accused of one or more crimes
The cultural enrichment of Switzerland, as in the rest of Europe, continues swimmingly.
I’ve lamented for years to anyone who would listen that Switzerland was, for far too long, far too functional and high-trust — as well as, it goes without saying, way too white for its own good.
Related: White Children Now a Minority in American Public Schools
The remedy has arrived in the form of biological diversity seeking something called “asylum.”
Via Remix News (emphasis added):
Around 80.5 percent of asylum seekers from North African countries were accused of one or more offenses in Switzerland, underlining the massive amount of criminality present in this foreign population. The data comes from the State Secretariat for Migration (SEM).
For asylum seekers as a whole, the rate of criminality is much lower, with only 12.5 percent having been accused of one or more offenses. Nationals from Algeria, Morocco and Tunisia are therefore extremely overrepresented compared to other asylum seeker groups…
In 2024, a “24-hour” rule was introduced for accelerated asylum procedures for North African countries, which enables Swiss authorities to process asylum claims with a low chance of success more quickly. Applicants can still appeal the decisions, which can significantly increase delay in reaching a final decision.*
“Criminals must leave Switzerland quickly. This is a priority of the asylum strategy,” said SEM spokesperson Daniel Bach.
However, the process is often delayed by the actions of asylum seekers, including refusing to provide fingerprints and failing to show up for deportation appointments.
*This is a microcosm of a much wider problem with the immigration systems across Europe, in that migrants are somehow entitled to “due process” to the extent that, even when their asylum claim is denied because they’re overwhelmingly bogus — NGOs in Britain have been caught training migrants to feign rainbow status in order to remain in-country — they somehow get to go through an appeals process, further wasting public resources and allowing them to rape and kill while their case works its way through the system.
Related: Migrant Assaults 'Severely' Disabled Man in Mall Bathroom (With an Extra Sadistic Twist)
Industrial fraud machine trains migrants to pretend to be gay in order to claim asylum status
— Benjamin Bartee (@BenBartee) July 14, 2026
Source: BBC pic.twitter.com/8uTH1SBaVN
French journalist convicted of ‘doxxing’ immigration lawyers
The obvious function of such an ostensibly dysfunctional immigration system as Europe’s is to make deporting the migrants at a pace commensurate to, or exceeding, the rate of influx impossible, thereby guaranteeing net migration in perpetuity, even if any government suddenly became interested in getting rid of them.
In that vein, a French “far-right” journalist was recently sentenced to prison for the “doxxing” of pro-immigration lawyers.
Related: EU to Begin Censoring Emojis on Social Media — For ‘Safety’
By “doxing,” the court meant disclosing their names and the cities where they practice — in other words, not “doxing” by any reasonable stretch.
But the lawyers serving the replacement migration machine must be protected from public scrutiny at all costs.
Via Le Monde (emphasis added):
Erik Tegnér was sentenced Thursday to six months in prison and a fine of 10,000 euros for having disclosed the personal data of lawyers specializing in foreigners' law, in an investigation published in 2025 by the far-right magazine…
Erik Tegnér was sentenced Thursday to six months in prison and a fine of 10,000 euros for having disclosed the personal data (surname, first name, city where they practice) of lawyers specializing in foreigners' law, in an investigation published in 2025 by Borders. Presented as "ideological activists" and designated as "hidden culprits of migratory chaos" taking advantage of one "juicy business", these lawyers were then targeted by hateful comments on the networks or threatened.
Thursday, when the judgment was announced, judge Youssef Badr recalled that Erik Tegnér "could not have been unaware that the publication was likely to cause violent behavior towards lawyers", targeted by one "virulent rhetoric" and "an accusatory and stigmatizing list".
