She went to her family doctor.
He prescribed suicide by state.
She went to her cancer doctor.
He suggested letting the government kill her.
She went to a funeral home to tell them to expect her sometime in the near future.
Just for good measure, in case she hadn’t heard the good news, the funeral home staff let her know that having the government off her, thus expediting the whole deal, is definitely an option worth exploring.
Canada: General practitioner, cancer specialist, and funeral home ALL, independent of each other, encourage woman to let government kill her with MAiD pic.twitter.com/heIXjLtDOL
— Ben Bartee (@BenBartee) March 22, 2026
Related: SHOCK Statistic: 4.1% of Deaths in Canada Due to Government Euthanasia (MAID)
I don’t have any direct evidence to this effect — the government denies it, for what it’s worth, though I would certainly welcome it from a whistleblower — but it would not surprise me in the slightest if the government were offering some sort of covert or semi-covert incentive scheme in which medical industry workers are financially compensated for each head they bring into the MAiD program.
Or maybe they have a quota system — sort of a carrot and stick approach.
Whatever gets the bodies to the morgue.
Related: Canadian Government Pushes Psychiatric Medication for 'Vaccine-Hesitant'
In any scenario, the ethical implications, to the extent ethics is still a concern whatsoever for the Western medical authorities, are profound.
And so are the fiscal ones.
Via OMEGA - Journal of Death and Dying (emphasis added):
This study explores the potential economic savings from expanding medical assistance in dying (MAiD) in Canada, where it is currently a leading cause of death, to include vulnerable groups that cost the government more than they contribute in taxes. These groups include individuals with severe mental health issues, the homeless, drug users, retired elderly, and indigenous communities. Both voluntary and non-voluntary scenarios were analyzed, projecting total savings of up to CAD $1.273 trillion by 2047. With an estimated 2.6 million deaths in the voluntary scenario, mostly among mentally ill and elderly populations, this cost-saving measure raises significant ethical concerns. Financially incentivizing MAiD could shift healthcare priorities away from providing necessary support, potentially devaluing vulnerable lives and fostering a troubling reliance on assisted death as an economic solution. The findings highlight a need for ethical scrutiny of MAiD policy expansion.
Of course, the allure of shaving down healthcare expenses for a cash-strapped government in a state-run healthcare system by killing its own burdens, thus freeing up capital to trannify children and handing out more government grant cash to indigenous two-spirits or whatever, is fairly straightforward — the so-called “death panel” system that was a conspiracy theory until it became established conspiracy fact.
But then there’s the more uncomfortable and aspirational governing philosophy underpinning MAiD, as predicted in soul-crushing detail by Aldous Huxley in Brave New World, in which the government drugs its population into stupefied compliance throughout the lifespan and ultimately kills them before old age and disease take root.The world's stable now. People are happy; they get what they want, and they never want what they can't get. They're well off; they're safe; they're never ill; they're not afraid of death; they're blissfully ignorant of passion and old age; they're plagued with no mothers or fathers; they've got no wives, or children, or lovers to feel strongly about; they're so conditioned that they practically can't help behaving as they ought to behave. And if anything should go wrong, there's soma.
