Chronicling the ongoing intersectional struggle to liberate women — inclusively defined as the legacy kind and the transgender individuals — from the Patriarchy™, one microaggression at a time.
Street Karen thug, driven to blind rage by abortion protester, resorts predictably to violence
In the video below, a feral street Karen — decked out in a jean shorts, flannel shirt and a butch haircut ensemble that screams “I hate the patriarchy and I made my ex-husband wish he was never born after I took him to the cleaners in divorce court and relegated him an indigent squatting in a hovel with no child custody” — apparently randomly walks by a gentleman protesting abortion on the street.
Related: HuffPo Feminist Quits Shaving to Protest for Abortion Rights
With what looks to be her daughter in tow, the obviously civilized thing to do would either have been to say her piece and continue on her way or just ignore the protester altogether, who was not obstructing the sidewalk and was causing her no harm aside from contradicting her clearly deeply-held belief in the virtue of abortion.
(At least, the protester was committing no harm in the literal, legal sense; surely she would claim to have been psychologically traumatized or whatever by a sign.)
Obviously, the Karen, as the Karen is wont to do by its nature, took a different, decidedly more violent tack.
The thing that seemed to really set her off was the guy’s correction of her appalling declaration that “a miscarriage is a medical abortion.”
“No it’s not,” he answers.
She then grabs his mic, hurls her iced frappe or whatever at his face, hits him, and kicks his sign.
Karen goes to war with peaceful abortion protester pic.twitter.com/WcQ9Su79Oh
— Ben Bartee (@BenBartee) February 16, 2026
For the record, just to confirm that, in fact, miscarriages do not qualify as “medical abortions” by any rational definition, I plugged the Karen’s assertion in question form into ChatGPT, which one would expect to lean heavily in the direction of pro-abortionism: “Are miscarriages considered medical abortions?”
Answer:
No, miscarriages are not considered medical abortions, although the terminology can overlap and cause confusion.
Here’s the difference:
🔹 Miscarriage
A miscarriage is the spontaneous (natural) loss of a pregnancy before about 20 weeks.
Medical term: spontaneous abortion.
It happens without medical intervention.🔹 Medical abortion
A medical abortion is the intentional termination of a pregnancy using medication, typically:
- Mifepristone
- Misoprostol
It is done by choice for personal or medical reasons.
Women’s liberation: unintended consequences
The decades-long Middle East wars of recent history have taught us, among other lessons, that regime change often has unintended consequences in terms of power vacuums filled by the most extreme power blocs within whatever polity (ISIS in Iraq and Syria, as an example).
What outcome looks good in theory on paper — the oppressed people of Iraq will welcome their liberators with open arms and enthusiastically adopt Western-style liberal democracy — doesn’t pan out quite that way in practice.
In a similar vein, far from merely fostering equality and harmony among the sexes, the feminist revolution has thrown basic human interactions wildly off kilter.
Related: Chinese Communist Party Bans 'Sissy Men' From Appearing in Media
While obviously this is not an endorsement of violence against women, which is always wrong except in the context of self-defense, the reality is that the scene below of a Karen losing her mind for no apparent reason while harassing and assaulting a man on the street for plowing snow simply would not happen if the law of the jungle were in effect.
Here we have a much larger man with a shovel — incidentally, doing nothing wrong, based on all the evidence in the video — being harangued, berated, and ultimately physically assaulted by a neighborhood Karen in her bathrobe, apparently upset by his snow-plowing activity because it violates the local HOA regulations or whatever.
HOA Karen has violent meltdown over man illicitly shoveling snow pic.twitter.com/AmGMrJe0h5
— Ben Bartee (@BenBartee) February 16, 2026
Due to feminist mores, this guy is meant to tolerate her screaming in his face and shoving him because she doesn’t approve of him shoveling snow. If he responded in kind, of course, he would be the one going to jail and possibly on the evening news as a violent offender abusing innocent middle-aged women.
Every guy knows if you go outside and start in on another guy like this, violence is on the table — and, if you’re the aggressor, it would be justified. But, for some reason, despite all of the other contexts in which women have achieved “equality,” responding the same way to a female aggressor is considered transgressive.
Weird how that works.
Again, this is not an endorsement of woman-beating, and it’s neither entirely apropos to the prior discussion. I am often reminded of this infamous clip of Sean Connery, a man from a simpler time, explaining the merits of light physical discipline of women when all reason fails, to a visibly affronted Barbara Walters.
